Also, what does this mean about Arthur’s poisoning and Raven’s cure? The substance Ed finds is clearly Rose’s cure – he says it’s poisonous to humans. Was it the same thing that made Arthur ill, or not?
Well Ed took Arthur’s blood and then he was testing it and smirking? Now I kinda see it. What if he infected the monster twins to begin with that Arthur was supposed to kill knowing he’d get infected? Fuck!
But what if Rose wasn’t talking about the cure to the poison Arthur had at all but to the cure for vampirism if that’s what her gf is talking abt here? So it’s all just a case of miscommunication but Ed was banking on that??? 0.0
It doesn’t matter, I think. Think GLaDOS. A cure cuts off any more research into the disease. He may simply hope to find beneficial uses for it. But if they can cure the disease then no more possibility of finding anything new.
Its not the correct thing to do if you objective is to remove the disease. It may be correct if you hope to utilize the disease somehow though.
First Ed reminded me of Slenderman, now Freddy. Always was a creepy guy, though. I remember liking him a bit… Well, as long as he is murdering pretty ladies he will get no adoration from me.
(I love uncontrollable badasses that never get caught, sooo I still like him but just the tiniest bit)
Oh man, so many feels here.
hijo de puta
Aww shit.
no, but why!!! those are Freddie’s claws you cheap dastard!!!
I like his style.
Oh my. Is C. E. aware of what he did in her name? I’m assuming not…
This is some Hal 9000 stuff right here…
Pretty sure he did it in his own name, so that research could continue.
Murder for job security.
I like that it’s ambiguous — although I *think* he’s doing it autonomously, C.E. also obviously believes in playing the long game.
Poor Scarlet, and poor Rose!!
Also, what does this mean about Arthur’s poisoning and Raven’s cure? The substance Ed finds is clearly Rose’s cure – he says it’s poisonous to humans. Was it the same thing that made Arthur ill, or not?
Well Ed took Arthur’s blood and then he was testing it and smirking? Now I kinda see it. What if he infected the monster twins to begin with that Arthur was supposed to kill knowing he’d get infected? Fuck!
But what if Rose wasn’t talking about the cure to the poison Arthur had at all but to the cure for vampirism if that’s what her gf is talking abt here? So it’s all just a case of miscommunication but Ed was banking on that??? 0.0
Wait. If Rose didnt do anything wrong, does that mean Ed’s the one who poisoned Arthur?? o.0
Oh. I see how this is. Make me feel bad for the person I thought was the bad guy?
… Well, shit.
I really really do not follow the logic of this guy. What truth does he want to get to?
It doesn’t matter, I think. Think GLaDOS. A cure cuts off any more research into the disease. He may simply hope to find beneficial uses for it. But if they can cure the disease then no more possibility of finding anything new.
Its not the correct thing to do if you objective is to remove the disease. It may be correct if you hope to utilize the disease somehow though.
I wonder exactly how much of him (it ?) is mechanical
Pretty sure that’s just a really sharp glove.
First Ed reminded me of Slenderman, now Freddy. Always was a creepy guy, though. I remember liking him a bit… Well, as long as he is murdering pretty ladies he will get no adoration from me.
(I love uncontrollable badasses that never get caught, sooo I still like him but just the tiniest bit)
i cant wait for more!
But…they were so happy.
I like him.
In that last panel I suddenly remembered who he reminded me of: Sōsuke Aizen from Bleach.